After completing a residency in pediatrics and one in preventive medicine at Johns Hopkins, I started a practice for my neighborhood of Williamsburg, Brooklyn in September 2007. People would visit my website; see my Google calendar; choose a time and input their symptoms; my iphone would alert me; I would make a house call; they'd pay me via Paypal; and we'd follow up by email, IM, videochat, or in person.

Fast Company calls me The Doctor of the Future. I've got a design and consulting firm called The Future Well. Read more about me here.

  • …the biggest federal subsidy for private insurance coverage is untouched by Stupak’s amendment. It’s the $250 billion the government spends each year making employer-sponsored health-care insurance tax-free. That money, however, subsidizes the insurance of 157 million Americans, many of them quite affluent. Imagine if Stupak had attempted to expand his amendment to their coverage. It would, after all, have been the same principle: Federal policy should not subsidize insurance that offers abortion coverage. But it would have failed in an instant. That group is too large, and too affluent, and too politically powerful for Congress to dare to touch their access to reproductive services. But the poorer women who will be using subsidies on the exchange proved a much easier target. In substance, this amendment was as much about class as it was about choice.

    Ezra Klein (via azspot)

    Exactly.

    (via southpol)

    (via newsweek)

    Yes. This health reform charade is more about protecting the interests of the few under the guise of expanding coverage for all. Keep in mind, in 2016, the cost of providing insurance for each employee will average $28,500. This will be even more expensive on the individual market. How many families in the US will be able to afford “coverage for all?” Especially when the penalty for not purchasing health insurance is only 2.5% of gross income. The decision then becomes $28,500 vs. $2,500 for a family earning $100,000. If you decide to pay for insurance, after taxes you’ll have $36,500 in net income. If you decide to pay the penalty, after taxes you’ll have $62,500.

    Tough decision…

    33 notes    /   Comments    /   Reblogged 2 years ago from newsweek
    1. talby liked this
    2. dalasverdugo liked this
    3. texturism liked this
    4. doublecufflove liked this
    5. changingclimate reblogged this from enteekaygee
    6. glamourousslop liked this
    7. chriscantrell liked this
    8. asprettyasasong reblogged this from enteekaygee
    9. travs liked this
    10. tlvx liked this
    11. dollarstoregangster liked this
    12. shoeboxapt reblogged this from newsweek and added:
      azspot; southpol ; newsweek)
    13. tragos liked this
    14. mizzchelle liked this
    15. agentive reblogged this from jayparkinsonmd
    16. fatmanatee liked this
    17. lostthought liked this
    18. laurakelly00 reblogged this from jayparkinsonmd
    19. jayparkinsonmd reblogged this from newsweek
    20. iwasjustsayin liked this
    21. camcron reblogged this from enteekaygee
    22. greaterthanlapsed reblogged this from azspot
    23. bthny reblogged this from enteekaygee
    24. laurakelly00 liked this
    25. adeandabet reblogged this from enteekaygee
    26. newsweek reblogged this from southpol
    27. shorterexcerpts reblogged this from southpol
    28. julyshewillfly liked this
    29. shorterexcerpts liked this
    30. enteekaygee reblogged this from southpol
    31. southpol reblogged this from azspot
    32. azspot posted this